代做TEC101 Professional Practice and Communication Assessment 2代写C/C++语言
- 首页 >> CSAssessment 2 Information
Subject Code: |
TEC101 |
Subject Name: |
Professional Practice and Communication |
Assessment Title: |
IT ethics |
Assessment Type: |
Presentation (group assessment) |
Length: |
10 minutes |
Weighting: |
30% (Including 10% for individual self-reflection) |
Total Marks: |
30 (Including 10 marks for individual self-reflection) |
Submission: |
In class and MyKBS |
Due Date: |
Week 6 |
Your Task
The purpose of this assessment is to reinforce the six values that constitute the Australian Computer Society’s (ACS) code of ethics. The structure of the assessment, however, is designed to also provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your ability to work effectively as a member of a team.
Assessment Description
Week 6’s class will be dedicated entirely to this assessment. You will be placed into a group of five and given two contentious topics on which you will deliver a presentation. The topics will be sourced entirely from the ACS code of ethics and may include, for example, the following:
• It is only necessary to disclose a conflict of interest if there is a risk of damage to the public.
• It is impossible to completely disassociate personal opinions from professional advice.
• It is okay to claim you’ve completed an IT qualification so long as you’re past the halfway mark.
This assessment aims to achieve the following subject learning outcomes:
LO2 |
Explain the mitigation of risks associated with ethical, societal, legal, and privacy-related IT issues. |
LO3 |
Demonstrate as a team member the attributes and practices that contribute to effective and efficient IT teams. |
LO4 |
Communicate IT-related concepts, problems, solutions, and outcomes to diverse stakeholders via the use of various communication methods. |
Assessment Instructions
• You will be given 30 minutes to craft your arguments and identify the sequence of speakers.
• Each team member must equally present for two minutes.
• The assessment will conclude with an in-class self-reflection that will necessitate a 100-word description of your experiences as a team member.
Generative AI Traffic Lights
Please see the level of Generative AI that this assessment is Level 2 has been designed to accept:
Traffic Light |
Amount of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenerativeAI) usage |
Evidence Required |
This assessment (✓) |
Level 1 |
Prohibited: No GenerativeAI allowed This assessment showcases your individual knowledge, skills and/or personal experiences in the absence of Generative AI support. |
The use of generative AI is prohibited for this assessment and may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. |
|
Level 2 |
Optional: You may use GenerativeAI for research and content generation that is appropriately referenced. See assessment instructions for details This assessment allows you to engage with Generative AI as a means of expanding your understanding, creativity, and idea generation in the research phase of your assessment and to produce content that enhances your assessment. I.e., images. You do not have to use it. |
The use of GenAI is optional for this assessment. Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing- other-sources/referencing-other-sources- generative-ai In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
✓ |
Level 3 |
Compulsory: You must use GenerativeAI to complete your assessment See assessment instruction for details This assessment fully integrates Generative AI, allowing you to harness the technology's full potential in collaboration with your own expertise. Always check your assessment instructions carefully as there may still be limitations on what constitutes acceptable use, and these may be specific to each assessment. |
You will be taught how to use generative AI and assessed on its use. Your collaboration with GenerativeAI must be clearly referenced just as you would reference any other resource type used. Click on the link below to learn how to reference GenerativeAI. https://library.kaplan.edu.au/referencing- other-sources/referencing-other-sources- generative-ai In addition, you must include an appendix that documents your GenerativeAI collaboration including all prompts and responses used for the assessment. Unapproved use of generative AI as per assessment details during the content generation parts of your assessment may potentially result in penalties for academic misconduct, including but not limited to a mark of zero for the assessment. Ensure you follow the specific assessment instructions in the section above. |
|