代写Professional and Research Skills in Practice [PGGE11238] Assessment 1 – Dynamic presentation代做Stat

- 首页 >> Web

Professional and Research Skills in Practice [PGGE11238]

Assessment 1 - Dynamic presentation

Assessment summary

You need to research, design and create a short stand-alone presentation which incorporates a graphical data output.

Learning objectives

Through this assessment you should demonstrate your capacity to:

-     Research and synthesise information on an environmental topic

-    Create professional graphical outputs through relevant software

-     Design and communicate messaging at an appropriate level for an identified audience through a visual medium.

Assessment marks

This presentation is worth 20% of the overall course mark.

Deadline

Submit your presentation to the Dropbox on Learn by noon on 11th  November 2024.

Background

There are many ways in which professionals are now expected to be able to communicate work and  ideas:  these   include  essays,  reports,  presentation,  posters,  social  media  etc.  This assessment is designed to give you practice in preparing a stand-alone presentation of the type that you  may  find  online,  or  is  often  seen  in  conferences  or  large  meetings.  This  type  of presentation is very useful in that it can be developed once, then ‘looped’ to play continuously on a screen. Sometimes the actual speaker may be in attendance to answer questions from the audience, but more often there is no one physically there all the time, so the presentation must be ‘self-contained’ , i.e. the presentation alone must be able to introduce the topic, use relevant materials (images, text, etc) and clearly articulate findings or conclusions. Developing this kind of presentation can very cost-effective, as it can be updated and re-used easily.

This is sometimes also known as a version of ane-poster, and has been further developed during the proliferation of online conferences. The key elements are that the poster is dynamic (e.g. moves by itself), tells a story from start to finish, is completely stand alone with no person or supporting materials required, and is appropriate to the audience.

Assessment details

You must choose a topic relevant to your programme to develop a ‘stand alone’ presentation. This means that you will not be physically delivering a talk, but rather developing materials that could be used in (for example) a conference where the audience can simply view the presentation on a screen.

You are free to choose any topic of interest within your field of study (which means a wider range probably!).  It may be something you have studied in the past, or are currently studying, or something you are interested in finding more about. You must not re-use any presentation from previous work though. You are expected to research the topic as necessary, but remember you are NOT conducting a literature review, so keep your research within reasonable time limits.

Your audience should  be your  peers  in  your  degree  programme.  This  means  you  are  not preparing a presentation for the general public (i.e. where you would need a detailed explanation of how the greenhouse effect works for example), but rather preparing the information at a level that would be of interest to yourself and those around you. So, prepare your presentation for an audience that already has a broad understanding of environmental issues.

Your  presentation  MUST  include  at  least  one  graphical data output that you  have  created yourself. This can include maps using GIS software, graphs using R software, or infographics. It needs to be effective in communicating the data, relevant to the story, and an original output. You need to clearly add your exam number in the caption to show it is your own work.

The main tool you are expected to use is Powerpoint or other presentation software such as Prezi. In Powerpoint you can develop your presentation as normal, but then you can also put timings on the time that each slide is viewed for, and then export the final timed presentation. You can, if you want, also record spoken narration (assuming you have a microphone) or add in video, but this is not essential. Any other presentation software where you can submit a final free- standing presentation is acceptable. If you use something like Prezi, make sure that you export a stand-alone file (called a Portable Prezi).

You can submit in any format that is easily accessible. The final submission MUST play the video/slides without any action from you, and be able to be run on a standard PC. Please remember  that  whatever  format  you  choose  to  submit  in,  the  presentation/topic  must  be understandable to the audience on viewing the presentation only.

The presentation that you submit must last for a minimum of two minutes, and a maximum of three minutes. There is no upper or lower limit to the number of slides, just bear in mind that the slides must be onscreen long enough for the reader/listener to fully understand the story. So, more slides is definitely not always better, and it is your professional judgement to the amount of information presented and the timings of availability.

Marking

The presentation will be marked holistically but based on the rubric elements below.

Element

70+

60

50

40

Match to brief

Presentation is within the time

limits, in the correct format, and works as a stand-alone piece.

The pace is easy to read without losing attention, and there is a

professional style. and tone.

Presentation is within the time

limits, in the correct format, and works as a stand-alone piece.

The pace is largely easy to read, and there is a general

professional style. and tone.

Some limitations in the match

e.g. too long, missing elements. The pace may be toofast or

slow, and there may be some slips in professional style and tone.

There are elements that

completely miss the briefe.g. does not move, out of time

boundaries. Unprofessional or

inappropriate style, and/or far too fast or slow.

Graphical output

The graphical output displays data relevant to the story with flair and originality, and

demonstrates outstanding skill in data communication

The graphical output displays relevant data clearly and

effectively.

The graphical output is present

but is not well designed, has

elements missing or has areas of confusion.

The graphical output is missing, or is present but is confusing,

poorly designed or not original.

Design and

theming

The design is eye-catching and uncluttered, with excellent use of colour, fonts, white spaces and

graphics as appropriate to create a compelling research story.

The design is clear and

appropriate, with very good use of colours, fonts and graphics to create a story.

There is clear effort in design

and theming, but some elements are jarring, too busy, difficult to

understand or irrelevant.

Very little effort is made in design and theming, with few or poor

graphics, crowded slides, too much writing or a lack of clear story.

Narrative and

audience

There is a clear and interesting narrative throughout, with a

hook, sufficient background and an clear conclusion. The level of language and information is

appropriate to the audience.

There is a clear narrative,

including background, results and conclusions. The level of language and information is largely appropriate to the

audience.

There is evidence of a narrative, but it may not be strong or easily followed. The level of information was too little or too much for the identified audience.

There is little evidence of a clear narrative, and the information is pitched inappropriately for the

narrative.

Research and clarity

The topic is relevant and

interesting, displaying excellent understanding and capacity to synthesise and disseminate

complex information.

The topic is relevant and

interesting and demonstrates a very good capacity to synthesise and disseminate information.

The information is largely well researched and communicated but with some flaws, including poor research and referencing, unclear messages or repetition.

The information is poorly researched, with limited references or attempts at synthesis.



站长地图