代写UPD109 HISTORY AND PURPOSE OF PLANNING 2024/25 Coursework 1代做留学生Matlab编程

- 首页 >> C/C++编程

UPD109

1st SEMESTER 2024/25 COURSEWORK

BA URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN – Year 2

HISTORY AND PURPOSE OF PLANNING

Coursework 1: Individual Coursework

Individual Coursework

It is crucial to understand that urban planning does not stand alone; instead it is the outcome of several factors simultaneously at play. To reflect this, the first assessment for UPD109 is an individual coursework on how a wide range of factors (e.g., cultural, economic, political, and social factors) influence urban planning ideas and practice in the history. Particularly, you need to examine this issue by conducting a comparative analysis between two cases, based on the lecture contents from Week 1 to Week 6 this semester. To be specific, you should choose two cases from the following six: Greek city, Roman city, Medieval city, Renaissance city, Colonial city, and Garden city. For example, your coursework could compare Greek city with Roman city. The coursework must be built on your knowledge  from  lectures,  seminars,  reading  materials,  as  well  as  other references. It must reflect learning outcomes A, B, C as indicated in the module specification.

Assessment Task

The individual coursework contains two main sections. In the first section, you are  required to  provide  an  overview  of how various factors  influence  urban planning and practice in two cases. In the second section, you are required to compare the two cases you have examined and show what the similarities and differences are and why. Besides these two main sections, you need to provide a brief introduction and conclusion to introduce your chosen cases and state your conclusions about your findings.

The key activities in this assignment are to:

-    Introduce and justify the selection of the two cases (no more than 100 words);

-    Explain the two cases in terms of how various factors influence urban planning (no more than 650 words);

-    Summarize the main similarities and differences from the comparison (no more than 650 words);

-    Present a concluding paragraph which explains your understanding of your chosen cases (no more than 100 words).

You must cite your works in a Harvard style. referencing format.

Assessment Theme

The themes for assessment are structured under five main categories (totally 100%). The assessment is to be done according to XJTLU policies.

Theme

Description

Identification of cases (10%)

Justification and understanding of your

choices (i.e. as expressed in introduction and conclusions).

Overview of the two cases (40%)

Critical assessments of the two cases for diversity and depth of information.

Comparative analysis (40%)

Demonstration of your capability in comparing the similarities and differences between the two cases.

Written expression (5%)

Ease with which a reader can follow the structure and arguments. The sections are well integrated.

Sources/referencing (5%)

A complete reference list of all sources used in the assignment must be included at the end.

Marking Rubric

Identificatio n of cases

(10%)

Overview of

the two cases

(40%)

Comparativ e analysis (40%)

Written expressi on (5%)

Sources/ referenci ng (5%)

Absent

No

submission or element

missing

No

submission or element

missing

No

submission or element

missing

No

submissi on or

element missing

No

submissio

n or

element missing

Deficie nt

Cases not

clearly

identified and poor

evidence of understandi ng of cases

Overview

not clearly structured

and poor

evidence of analytical

thinking

Comparative analysis is

not clearly structured

and poor

evidence of comparison

Assignme nt

disjointed and lacks focus and cohesion

No

consisten cy in

referencin g system

Adequa te

Cases

identified and

evidence of understandi ng of cases meets

threshold

Overview is structured

and

evidence of analytical

thinking meets

threshold

Comparative analysis is

structured and

evidence of comparison meets

threshold

Assignme nt is

somewha

t

structure d but not always

coherent

Referenci ng shows more than

one

system

and many technical

errors

Good

Cases

identified

and nearly

comprehens ive evidence of

understandi ng of cases

Overview is structured

and nearly

comprehens ive evidence of analytical thinking

Comparative analysis is

structured and

comprehens ive evidence of

comparison

Assignme

nt is

structure d and

largely

coherent

Referenci ng shows more than

one

system

and a few

technical errors

Excelle nt

Cases

clearly

identified

and

comprehens

Overview is clearly

structured and

comprehens

Comparative

analysis is clearly

structured and

Assignme nt is

structure d and

contribute

Referenci ng shows one

system

and a few

ive evidence

of

understandi ng of cases

ive evidence of analytical thinking

comprehens ive evidence of

comparison

s to

argument

technical errors

Perfect

Cases

explicated with great

clarity and outstanding evidence of understandi ng of cases

Overview

structured

with great

clarity and outstanding evidence of analytical

thinking

Comparative analysis

structured

with great

clarity and outstanding evidence of comparison

Assignme nt

structure d with

great clarity and

greatly

contribute s to

argument

Referenci ng shows

one

system and no

technical

errors



站长地图