KIT206讲解、Software辅导、讲解c++编程语言、C#留学生辅导 解析C/C++编程|辅导R语言程序
- 首页 >> Java编程 KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 1/4
Assignment 2: C# Application & Test Report
The Brief
Your small development team of (ideally) three people has been asked to implement and test the
Human Resources Information System desktop application. Your software product will be a databasebacked
desktop application with a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) graphical front end,
implemented in C#. As part of your development efforts you will prepare and apply a small collection
of test cases to verify that the completed application meets some of the key requirements agreed
with the client.
Submission
Your progress will be assessed, and feedback given, during your Week 11 tutorial. Additional details
of this checkpoint will be provided after the mid-semester break.
By 1500 (3pm) Friday October 16th submit deliverables 1 and 2 to the Assignment 2 – C# Application
& Test Report assignment folder on the unit’s MyLO site. Each member should also complete the peer
review activity via Buddycheck on MyLO.
Team Formation
Your teammates should be selected from other students in your tutorial group whom you have not
worked with in Assignment 1. Once the grouping has been approved by your tutor, each member
should go to the Groups page on the unit’s MyLO site, select the same group from the list, and add
themselves. A fourth member, if required, can only be added by your tutor.
Deliverables
There are two deliverables in this assignment:
1. a zipped VisualStudio project that contains the WPF-based application that must be
submitted to the assignment folder, accompanied by
2. a completed test report in PDF, which must also be submitted to the assignment folder.
The starting point for developing the application
A standard OO model for the system (some scenarios, all class diagrams and some sequence diagrams)
will be released after the Assignment 1 due date, along with details of the database schema. You may
then use your group members’ joint experience of developing their own OO models to determine the
rest of your design. You may also deviate from the standard design as you see fit. This will give
different development teams some freedom in their implementation choices.
OO Model versus WPF
In the OO model each view is a separate class, which in WPF corresponds to defining a UserControl
for each major view. Because this may complicate some of the event handling code, it is acceptable
in the assignment to place separate views directly within the main window. Note, however, that the
HD level of the Use of WPF assessment criterion requires that at least one user control be defined,
and that defining your own controls will actually make each individual source file easier to manage.
WPF is not available in MacOS; development of the GUI and the final stages of the software will need
to be completed in Windows. Please email me (Julian.Dermoudy@utas.edu.au) if this will present
problems.
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 2/4
Development approach
Because the final application requires knowledge of the C# language, how to communicate with a
database using C# (and LINQ) and how to design and construct GUIs using WPF, and because these
topics are to be covered over a period of some weeks, as foreshadowed in the Week 6 lecture, we
recommend that you take a prototyping approach to the development of this application. This will
allow you and your team to make useful progress on parts of the system even before you have
obtained the skills required to implement the whole system. (Note that this will likely entail some
manual copying of source files between projects as you migrate from a console application to a WPF
application.) We suggest the following implementation stages (you may of course adopt a different
development path if you find it suits your team better):
Stage
Timeframe
(semester
week)
Application type & functionality Notes
1 8–9 Console application with entity
(data) classes, partially-implemented
control classes and at least one
database adapter class.
One or more driver classes
containing Main() that can test
features such as filtering of the staff
or unit lists.
1. May have a GUI, but this should
be no more than necessary to
exercise/test implemented
functionality (should be able to
throw this GUI away later).
2. Database adapter will need to
return artificial data.
2 9–10 As above but using live data, which
will substantially ease the burden on
you to create artificial test data.
Draft test cases that are complete in
all details apart from test methods
(which will likely still be high-level
until the GUI is built).
(1) as above
3 11–13 WPF application with custom
controls for different views. Control
classes updated to know about GUI
components and event handlers
connected.
Test cases completed and applied to
your application.
1. Transition will be easiest by
creating a new WPF Application
project and importing the preexisting
class files into it.
2. This cannot be completed on an
Apple computer running MacOS as
WPF is not available on that
platform.
OO Packages and C# Namespaces
As C# applications have a top-level namespace, which was not part of the OO Design, we recommend
that each package in the OO Design becomes a nested namespace within your application’s top-level
namespace (which should be HRIS). Note that the namespace and project name do not have to be the
same, even though Visual Studio will initially make them the same.
The School Database (aka HRIS Database)
The case study MySQL database is available via the following settings:
Database: kit206
User Id: kit206
Password: kit206
Data Source: alacritas.cis.utas.edu.au
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 3/4
You can also browse the data via phpMyAdmin (append that to the end of the server name). As the
database is shared it will not appear in your own list of databases on alacritas if you log in under your
own user name. An EER Diagram for the database plus some details on enumerated value columns
accompanies this document. If you are not on campus, you will need to use VPN
(https://utas1.servicenow.com/selfservice/?id=kb_category&kb_category=c06bbabbdbd86bc08bf8413b3a9619bb)
to
access the database.
Data quality
The database is currently live and contains fictitious data. The data are consistent in that foreign key
relationships are all valid, although initially there will not be much information in the database. More
entries, or more realistic entries, may be added later in semester, but this is not guaranteed.
The Testing Report
Concurrently with development of the application you will create a test plan containing four test cases
to verify the following subset of requirements in the HRIS RTM:
• SWC 1 (Entry 1 in the RTM)
• UC8_User_views_StaffList
• UC16_User_selects_StaffDetails
• UC24_User_selects_Unit
Each test case will be based on the Test Report Template, which is available on MyLO. Each test case
that is based on a use case should include at least two methods by which the requirement will be
tested. NTH features of use cases should also be tested and so will provide additional methods, even
if they were not implemented; the quality of the test case will be assessed, not the one line outcome
of whether it passes or not. The test cases for the SWC will likely need only one, brief method in order
to be tested.
Ensure that all instructional entries (Repeat the following box…,and Outcome…) and unused method–outcome rows are removed from your submitted test plan. The
document should include a title and your team name on the first page; the first test case can start
immediately below that.
When the application is complete, apply the test plan to it and record the outcome for each method.
Remember that if the outcome is ‘fail’ then an explanation of when (which step) or how must also be
recorded.
Sources of information for compiling the testing plan
Follow the procedures described in Module 5 Use case-Based Testing to derive the test cases for the
indicated SWC and SW entries. The RTM will be your primary resource for identifying the criteria for
each test case. The original requirements document may also provide some useful information. The
structured scenarios you prepared during Assignment 1, in conjunction with the specific application
being tested, will provide the basic structure of the testing methods in each test case, since they
describe the user’s actions in each use case.
Assessment
The assessment criteria for the final submission are available in an accompanying document, in Excel
and PDF formats.
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 4/4
Your progress will also be assessed during your week 11 tutorial, which will contribute up to 5% to
your final grade in the unit. The assessment criteria for this check will be released after the midsemester
break.
Peer assessment
Peer assessment will be completed as part of the tutorial in week 13. You will have the opportunity
to provide both qualitative and quantitative feedback on your teammates’ performance via
Buddycheck on MyLO.
Revision history
2020-08-27 Initial release
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 1/4
Assignment 2: C# Application & Test Report
The Brief
Your small development team of (ideally) three people has been asked to implement and test the
Human Resources Information System desktop application. Your software product will be a databasebacked
desktop application with a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) graphical front end,
implemented in C#. As part of your development efforts you will prepare and apply a small collection
of test cases to verify that the completed application meets some of the key requirements agreed
with the client.
Submission
Your progress will be assessed, and feedback given, during your Week 11 tutorial. Additional details
of this checkpoint will be provided after the mid-semester break.
By 1500 (3pm) Friday October 16th submit deliverables 1 and 2 to the Assignment 2 – C# Application
& Test Report assignment folder on the unit’s MyLO site. Each member should also complete the peer
review activity via Buddycheck on MyLO.
Team Formation
Your teammates should be selected from other students in your tutorial group whom you have not
worked with in Assignment 1. Once the grouping has been approved by your tutor, each member
should go to the Groups page on the unit’s MyLO site, select the same group from the list, and add
themselves. A fourth member, if required, can only be added by your tutor.
Deliverables
There are two deliverables in this assignment:
1. a zipped VisualStudio project that contains the WPF-based application that must be
submitted to the assignment folder, accompanied by
2. a completed test report in PDF, which must also be submitted to the assignment folder.
The starting point for developing the application
A standard OO model for the system (some scenarios, all class diagrams and some sequence diagrams)
will be released after the Assignment 1 due date, along with details of the database schema. You may
then use your group members’ joint experience of developing their own OO models to determine the
rest of your design. You may also deviate from the standard design as you see fit. This will give
different development teams some freedom in their implementation choices.
OO Model versus WPF
In the OO model each view is a separate class, which in WPF corresponds to defining a UserControl
for each major view. Because this may complicate some of the event handling code, it is acceptable
in the assignment to place separate views directly within the main window. Note, however, that the
HD level of the Use of WPF assessment criterion requires that at least one user control be defined,
and that defining your own controls will actually make each individual source file easier to manage.
WPF is not available in MacOS; development of the GUI and the final stages of the software will need
to be completed in Windows. Please email me (Julian.Dermoudy@utas.edu.au) if this will present
problems.
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 2/4
Development approach
Because the final application requires knowledge of the C# language, how to communicate with a
database using C# (and LINQ) and how to design and construct GUIs using WPF, and because these
topics are to be covered over a period of some weeks, as foreshadowed in the Week 6 lecture, we
recommend that you take a prototyping approach to the development of this application. This will
allow you and your team to make useful progress on parts of the system even before you have
obtained the skills required to implement the whole system. (Note that this will likely entail some
manual copying of source files between projects as you migrate from a console application to a WPF
application.) We suggest the following implementation stages (you may of course adopt a different
development path if you find it suits your team better):
Stage
Timeframe
(semester
week)
Application type & functionality Notes
1 8–9 Console application with entity
(data) classes, partially-implemented
control classes and at least one
database adapter class.
One or more driver classes
containing Main() that can test
features such as filtering of the staff
or unit lists.
1. May have a GUI, but this should
be no more than necessary to
exercise/test implemented
functionality (should be able to
throw this GUI away later).
2. Database adapter will need to
return artificial data.
2 9–10 As above but using live data, which
will substantially ease the burden on
you to create artificial test data.
Draft test cases that are complete in
all details apart from test methods
(which will likely still be high-level
until the GUI is built).
(1) as above
3 11–13 WPF application with custom
controls for different views. Control
classes updated to know about GUI
components and event handlers
connected.
Test cases completed and applied to
your application.
1. Transition will be easiest by
creating a new WPF Application
project and importing the preexisting
class files into it.
2. This cannot be completed on an
Apple computer running MacOS as
WPF is not available on that
platform.
OO Packages and C# Namespaces
As C# applications have a top-level namespace, which was not part of the OO Design, we recommend
that each package in the OO Design becomes a nested namespace within your application’s top-level
namespace (which should be HRIS). Note that the namespace and project name do not have to be the
same, even though Visual Studio will initially make them the same.
The School Database (aka HRIS Database)
The case study MySQL database is available via the following settings:
Database: kit206
User Id: kit206
Password: kit206
Data Source: alacritas.cis.utas.edu.au
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 3/4
You can also browse the data via phpMyAdmin (append that to the end of the server name). As the
database is shared it will not appear in your own list of databases on alacritas if you log in under your
own user name. An EER Diagram for the database plus some details on enumerated value columns
accompanies this document. If you are not on campus, you will need to use VPN
(https://utas1.servicenow.com/selfservice/?id=kb_category&kb_category=c06bbabbdbd86bc08bf8413b3a9619bb)
to
access the database.
Data quality
The database is currently live and contains fictitious data. The data are consistent in that foreign key
relationships are all valid, although initially there will not be much information in the database. More
entries, or more realistic entries, may be added later in semester, but this is not guaranteed.
The Testing Report
Concurrently with development of the application you will create a test plan containing four test cases
to verify the following subset of requirements in the HRIS RTM:
• SWC 1 (Entry 1 in the RTM)
• UC8_User_views_StaffList
• UC16_User_selects_StaffDetails
• UC24_User_selects_Unit
Each test case will be based on the Test Report Template, which is available on MyLO. Each test case
that is based on a use case should include at least two methods by which the requirement will be
tested. NTH features of use cases should also be tested and so will provide additional methods, even
if they were not implemented; the quality of the test case will be assessed, not the one line outcome
of whether it passes or not. The test cases for the SWC will likely need only one, brief method in order
to be tested.
Ensure that all instructional entries (Repeat the following box…,
document should include a title and your team name on the first page; the first test case can start
immediately below that.
When the application is complete, apply the test plan to it and record the outcome for each method.
Remember that if the outcome is ‘fail’ then an explanation of when (which step) or how must also be
recorded.
Sources of information for compiling the testing plan
Follow the procedures described in Module 5 Use case-Based Testing to derive the test cases for the
indicated SWC and SW entries. The RTM will be your primary resource for identifying the criteria for
each test case. The original requirements document may also provide some useful information. The
structured scenarios you prepared during Assignment 1, in conjunction with the specific application
being tested, will provide the basic structure of the testing methods in each test case, since they
describe the user’s actions in each use case.
Assessment
The assessment criteria for the final submission are available in an accompanying document, in Excel
and PDF formats.
KIT206 Software Design & Development KIT506 Software Application Design & Implementation
A2 Release 1: 2020-08-27 4/4
Your progress will also be assessed during your week 11 tutorial, which will contribute up to 5% to
your final grade in the unit. The assessment criteria for this check will be released after the midsemester
break.
Peer assessment
Peer assessment will be completed as part of the tutorial in week 13. You will have the opportunity
to provide both qualitative and quantitative feedback on your teammates’ performance via
Buddycheck on MyLO.
Revision history
2020-08-27 Initial release