代做Supply Chain Risk Management/IFB213TC AY24-25 / Sem 2代写C/C++编程

Grade

Point Scale

Criteria

A

80+

Ø Excellent execution of the assessment brief

Ø Evidence of extensive independent research; many relevant, suitable references have been consulted to write the coursework

Ø Mastery of relevant subjects/topics at the level that is beyond what has been explicitly taught

Ø Excellent application of the Harvard citation style

Ø Excellent ability to synthesize information, construct arguments and perform. critical analysis

Ø Excellent presentation & writing skills; the coursework focuses on the tasks and is well-structured

Ø Potentially worthy of publication

B

70 - 79

Ø Excellent execution of the assessment brief

Ø Evidence of significant independent research; adequate number of relevant, suitable references have been consulted to write the coursework

Ø Mastery of relevant subjects/topics

Ø Very good presentation; only one or two minor deficiencies

Ø Commendable ability to synthesize, construct arguments and perform. critical analysis

Ø Very good writing skills; the coursework focuses on the tasks and is well-structured

Ø Very good application of the Harvard Referencing Style; only one or two citation mistakes.

C

60 - 69

Ø Very good execution of the assessment brief; only a few omissions and minor mistakes

Ø Evidence of independent research; adequate number of references have been consulted to write the coursework although a few of them are not directly relevant to the course work or not from ideal sources

Ø Good command of relevant subjects/topics

Ø Good presentation although some areas could be improved

Ø Able to synthesize, construct arguments and perform. critical analysis

Ø Good command of English although there are a few grammatical, typographical or/and punctuational errors; the coursework focuses on the tasks and is well-structured

Ø Good application of the Harvard Referencing Style; only a few citation mistakes

D

50- 59

Ø Good execution of the assessment brief; but there are some omissions and mistakes

Ø Evidence of independent research; however, the number of references or/and the quality of some references falls short

Ø Adequate understanding of relevant subjects/topics although there are a few learning gaps

Ø Satisfactory presentation although there are some deficiencies

Ø Able to synthesize, construct arguments and perform. critical analysis; but some parts of the coursework are descriptive

Ø Adequate command of English although there are some grammatical, typographical or/and punctuational errors; some deficiencies in the structure or/and the writing sometimes deviates from the tasks

Ø Satisfactory application of the Harvard Referencing Style; but there are some citation mistakes

E

40 - 49

Ø Marginally satisfactory execution of the brief; there are significant omissions and/mistakes

Ø Inadequate independent research; significant shortfalls in the number and/or quality of references

Ø Marginally satisfactory understanding of relevant subjects/topics; there are some noticeable learning gaps

Ø Marginally satisfactory presentation but there are noticeable deficiencies

Ø Little effort to synthesise, critically evaluate and analyse; some sections are very descriptive

Ø Attempted to apply the Harvard Referencing Style; but there are many citation mistakes

Ø There are many grammatical, typographical or/and punctuational errors; the writing lacks focus and/or structure

F

0 - 39

Ø Poor execution of the brief; there are many significant mistakes and/or commissions

Ø Little evidence of inadequate independent research and little effort to incorporate relevant references into writing

Ø Unsatisfactory understanding of relevant subjects/topics

Ø Unsatisfactory presentation; there are many significant deficiencies

Ø Very poor command of English; there are a lot of many grammatical, typographical or/and punctuational errors

Ø The coursework is ill-structured and most sections have little connections to the tasks

Ø No attempt to apply the Harvard citation style