代做CS6250 BGP Measurements Project – Summer 2024代写Python编程
- 首页 >> Database作业BGP Measurements Project – Summer 2024
In this assignment, we will explore Internet Measurements, a field of Computer Networks which
focuses on large scale data collection systems and techniques that provide us with valuable insights and help us understand (and troubleshoot) how the Internet works. There are multiple systems and techniques that focus on DNS measurements, BGP measurements, topology measurements, etc. There are multiple conferences in this area, which we invite you to explore and keep up with the papers that are published. The IMC conference is one of the flagship conferences in this area:ACM Internet Measurement Conference
A gentle introduction into the Internet Measurement field is to work with large scale BGP measurements and data to study topics such as:
• Characterizing growth of the Internet using various measures, such as number of advertised prefixes, the number of Autonomous Systems, the percentage growth of prefixes advertised by Autonomous System, and the dynamics of Autonomous System pathlengths
• Inferring problems related to short-lived Announcement and Withdrawals,
• Inferring possible DDoS attacks by identifying community countermeasures such as “ Remote Triggered Blackholing”
In this project we will use the BGPStream tool and its Python interface PyBGPStream to understand the BGP protocol and interact with BGP data. The goal is to gain a better understanding of BGP and to experience how researchers, practitioners, and engineers have been using BGPStream to gain insight into the dynamics of the Internet. If you are interested in going deeper, you can use these same tools to observe and analyze real-time BGP data or download and analyze other historical BGP data.
Project Overview and Background
The zip file accompanying this assignment contains the code and data needed to implement the functions in the file bgpm.py. You will submit only bgpm.py to Gradescope and all your code for the project must be contained within bgpm.py.
This project description, in combination with the comments in bgpm.py, comprise the complete requirements for the project. There are two complete sets of data included in the zip file and the provided test harness in check_solution.py will test each of your functions against both sets of data. You are welcome to copy and modify check_solution.py to better suit your development and debugging workflow, but you will have the best chance of success with the hidden data set used for grading if your final submission passes all the tests in the unmodified check_solution.py.
This project is designed to work in the class VM where the BGPStream libraries are installed. Your code will need to run without modification in the course VM.
Some of the functions will have runtimes of several minutes. There is a lot of data to process, so the best way to speedup those functions is by focusing on the efficiency of your implementation. It is possible, but not supported, to install BGPStream and PyBGPStream on your local machine. Pleasedon’task TA staff for help if you decide to do this. Gradescope imposes a hard time limit of 40 minutes for a grading session. We have no control over this and will not be able to make any allowances if your submission does not complete within that time limit.
For this project, we will be using BGPStream, an open-source software framework for live and historical BGP data analysis, supporting scientific research, operational monitoring, and post- event analysis. BGPStream andPyBGPStreamare maintained by theCenter for Applied Internet Data Analysis(CAIDA).
A high-level overview about how the BGPStream tool was developed was published by CAIDA in BGPStream: A Software Framework for Live and Historical BGP Data Analysis. This paper provides useful background and practical examples using BGPStream, so be sure to read it. Additionally, you should read African peering connectivity revealed via BGP route collectors, which provides a practical illustration of how the BGP collection system works.
All the tasks are to be implemented using the Python interface to BGPStream. You are strongly encouraged to browse the following resources to familiarize yourself with the tool, and to run the example code snippets:
- PyBGPStream API:https://bgpstream.caida.org/docs/api/pybgpstream
- PyBGPStream API Tutorial:https://bgpstream.caida.org/docs/tutorials/pybgpstream
- PyBGPStream Repository:https://github.com/CAIDA/pybgpstream
- Official Examples:https://github.com/CAIDA/pybgpstream/tree/master/examples
As will become apparent when you peruse the above documentation and tutorial information, the majority of BGPStream use cases involve gathering data – either live or historical – directly from the Route Collectors (which we refer to simply as “ collectors”). The code for accessing a collector or set of collectors directly usually looks like this:
stream = pybgpstream.BGPStream(
record_type="updates",
from_time="2017-07-07 00:00:00",
until_time="2017-07-07 00:10:00 UTC",
collectors=["route-views.sg", "route-views.eqix"], filter="peer 11666 and prefix more 210.180.0.0/16"
)
Each of the parameters topybgpstream.BGPStream() winnows the data retrieved from the collector(s). Because we are using pre-cached historical data in this project, you will not need to specify a collector or a time range. You also don’t need to use any additional filtering.
For this project, you can use set up and configure your streams with:
stream = pybgpstream.BGPStream(data_interface="singlefile") stream.set_data_interface_option("singlefile", type, fpath)
where type is one of [“rib-file”, “upd-file”] and fpathis a string representing the path to a specific cache file. When processing multiple files, you will create one stream per file.
Familiarize Yourself with the BGP Record Format and BGP Attributes
It is critical that you understand the BGP record format, especially the meaning and content of the fields (data attributes). A detailed explanation of BGP records and attributes can be found in RFC 4271: A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4).
It’s also worth spending sometime exploring the provided data using theBGPReadercommand line tool (“a command line tool that prints to standard output information about the BGP records and the BGP elems that are part of a BGP stream”). Doing so will be particularly helpful in understanding how the fields described in RFC 4271 and elsewhere map to the BGP record and BGP elem concepts used by BGPStream and PyBGPStream.
Because PyBGPStream allows you to extract the BGP attributes from BGP records using code, you will not have to interact with the BGP records in this format, but it is, nevertheless, helpful to see some examples using BGPReader to understand the fields. The next section shows
Here, we will show sample command line output from BGPReader for illustration purposes:
# read records from an update file, filtering for IPv4 only
bgpreader -e --data-interface singlefile --data-interface-option \
upd-file=./rrc04/update_files/ris.rrc04.updates.1609476900.300.cache \ --filter 'ipv 4'
# read records from a rib file, filtering for IPv4 only
bgpreader -e --data-interface singlefile --data-interface-option \ rib-file=./rrc04/rib_files/ris.rrc04.ribs.1262332740.120.cache \
The box below contains an example of an update record. In the record, the “ | ” character separates different fields. In yellow we have highlighted the type (A stands for Advertisement), the advertised prefix (210.180.224.0/19), the path (11666 3356 3786), and the origin AS (3786).
|
update |A |1499385779.000000 |routeviews |route- views.eqix |None |None |11666 |206.126.236.24 |210.180.224.0/19 |206. 126.236.24 |11666 3356 3786 |11666:1000 3356:3 3356:2003 3356:575 3786:0 3356:22 11666:1002 3356:666 3356:86 |None |None |
The following is a Routing Information Base (RIB) record example. Consecutive “ | ” characters indicate fields without data.
|
R |R |1445306400.000000 |routeviews |route- views.sfmix |||32354 |206.197.187.5 |1.0.0.0/24 |206.197.187.5 |3235 4 15169 |15169 ||| |
Do not rely on the directory layout of the provided data. Gradescope does not mirror the directory layout from the provided files. Specifically, in your final submission, do not directly access the filesystem in any way and do not import all or part of either os or pathlib. All filesystem interaction will occur via PyBGPStream and the file paths will betaken from the Python list in the parameter named cache_files that is passed to each function.
Locate the directory rrc04/rib_files included with this assignment. This directory contains
RIB dump files. Each filename (e.g., ris.rrc04.ribs.1262332740.120.cache) includes
the collector’s name (ris.rrc04), the type of data (ribs), and theUnixtimestampof the data (1262332740, which you can convert to a date via either of the two above links).
Each of the cache files is a snapshot of BGPM data collected by the collector at the time of the timestamp. In the rest of this assignment the term “snapshot” refers to the data in a particular cache file. Do not pull your own data. Your solution will be graded using cached data only.
You will need to write code to process the cache files. Each entry in cache_files is a string containing the full path to a cache file. To access a given path, your code will need to set up the appropriate data interface in your BGPStream() constructor:
stream = pybgpstream.BGPStream(data_interface="singlefile") stream.set_data_interface_option("singlefile", type, fpath)
where type is one of [“rib-file”, “upd-file”] and fpath is a string representing the path to a specific cache file. When processing multiple files, you will create one stream per file.
Task 1. Understanding BGP Routing table Growth
In this task you will measure the growth overtime of Autonomous Systems and advertised
prefixes. The growth of unique prefixes contributes to ever-growing routing tables handled by
routers in the Internet core. As optional background reading, please read the seminal paperOn
Characterizing BGP Routing Table Growth .
Task 1A: Unique Advertised Prefixes Over Time
This task will use cache files from the rib_files subdirectories. These are RIB files, so you will pass “ rib-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option(). Using the data from cache files, measure the number of unique advertised prefixes overtime. Each file is an annual snapshot. Calculate the number of unique prefixes within each snapshot by completing the function unique_prefixes_by_snapshot(). Make sure that your function returns the data structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
Task 1B: Unique Autonomous Systems OverTime
This task will use cache files from the rib_files subdirectories. These are RIB files, so you will pass “rib-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option(). Using the data from the
cache files, measure the number of unique Autonomous Systems overtime. Each file is an
annual snapshot. Calculate the number of unique ASes within each snapshot by completing the function unique_ases_by_snapshot(). Make sure that your function returns the data
structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
Note: Consider all paths in each snapshot. Here, we consider all AS that appear in the paths (not only the origin AS). You may encounter corner cases of paths with the following form.: “25152 2914 18687 {7829,14265}”. In this case, consider the AS in the brackets as a single AS. So, in this example, you will count 4 distinct ASes.
Task 1C: Top-10 Origin AS by Prefix Growth
This task will use cache files from the rib_files subdirectories. These are RIB files, so you will pass “rib-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option(). Using the data from the cache files, calculate the percentage growth in advertised prefixes for each AS over the entire timespan represented by the snapshots by completing the function top_10_ases_by_prefix_growth(). Make sure that your function returns the data structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
Consider each origin AS separately and measure the growth of the total unique prefixes advertised by that AS overtime. To compute this, for each origin AS:
1. Identify the first and the last snapshot where the origin AS appeared in the dataset.
2. Calculate the percentage increase of the advertised prefixes, using the first and the last snapshots.
3. Report the top 10 origin AS sorted smallest to largest according to this metric. In the event of a tie (i.e., the same percentage increase), the AS with the lower number should come first.
Corner case: When calculating the prefixes originating from an origin AS, you may encounter paths of the following form.: “25152 2914 18687 {7829,14265}”. This is a corner case, and it should affect only a small number of prefixes. In this case, you consider the entire set of AS “{7829,14265}” as the origin AS.
Task 2: Routing Table Growth: AS-Path Length Evolution Over Time
In this task you will measure if an AS is reachable over longer or shorter path lengths as time progresses. Towards this goal you will measure the AS path lengths, and how they evolve over time.
This task will use cache files from the rib_files subdirectories. These are RIB files, so you will pass “rib-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option(). Using the data from the cache files, calculate the shortest path for each origin AS in each snapshot by completing the function
shortest_path_by_origin_by_snapshot(). Make sure that your function returns the data structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
For each snapshot, you will compute the shortest AS pathlength for each origin AS in the snapshot by following the steps below:
- Identify each origin AS present in the snapshot. For example, given the path “11666 3356 3786”, “3786” is the origin AS.
- For each origin AS, identify all the paths for which it appears as the origin AS.
- Compute the length of each path by considering each AS in the path only once. In other words, you want to remove the duplicate entries for the same AS in the same path and count the total number of unique AS in the path.
- Example : Given the path “25152 2914 3786 2914 18313” , ”18313” is the origin AS and ”2914” appears twice in the path. This is a path of length 4.
- Among all the paths for an AS within the snapshot, compute the shortest pathlength.
- Filter out all paths of length 1.
- Corner cases: The data that we are working with are real data, which means that there may be few corner cases. In the vast majority of cases, paths have a straightforward
form. of “25152 2914 3786”, but you might encounter corner cases such as:
a. If an AS path has a single unique AS or a single repeated AS (e.g., “25152 25152 25152”), the path has length 1 and should be ignored
b. An AS path entry that looks like “{2914,14265}” is an aggregate or AS_SET and constitutes a single AS path entry. It does not need to be parsed in anyway. You can read more about aggregation inRFC 4271.
Example : The length of the AS path “25152 2914 18687 {2914,14265} 2945 18699” is 6.
Example : The length of the AS path “25152 2914 18687 18687 {18687}” is 4. The entries “18687” and “{18687}” are distinct, so you only de-
duplicate “18687” .
c. You can ignore all other corner cases.
Task 3: Announcement-Withdrawal Event Durations
In this task, we will measure how long prefix Announcements last before they are withdrawn.
This matters because, when a prefix gets Advertised and then Withdrawn, this information propagates and affects the volume of the associated BGP traffic. Optional background reading on this topic can be found inThe Shape of a BGP Update .
This task will use cache files from the update_files subdirectories. These are update files, so you will pass “upd-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option(). Using the data from the cache files, we will measure how long prefix Announcements last before they are withdrawn by completing the function aw_event_durations(). Make sure that your function returns the data structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
In defining Announcement Withdrawal (AW) events, we will only consider explicit withdrawals. An explicit withdrawal occurs when a prefix is advertised with an (A)nnouncement and is then (W)ithdrawn. In contrast, an implicit withdrawal occurs when a prefix is advertised (A) and then re-advertised (A) - usually with different BGP attributes.
To compute the duration of an Explicit AW event for a given peerIP/prefix, you will need to monitor the stream of (A)nnouncements and (W)ithdrawals separately per peerIP/prefix pair.
- Example: Given the stream: A1 A2 A3 W1 W2 W3 W4 for a specific peerIP/prefix pair, you have an implicit withdrawal A1-A2, another implicit withdrawal A2-A3, and, finally, an explicit withdrawal (and AW event) A3-W1. W1-W2, W2-W3, and W3-W4 are all
meaningless, as there’s no active advertisement. The duration of the AW event is the time difference between A3 and W1. Again, we are only looking for last A and first W.
- Example : Given the stream: A1 A2 A3 W1 W2 W3 W4 A4 A5 W4 for a specific peerIP/prefix pair, we have two AW events at A3-W1 and A5-W4.
- We consider only non-zero AW durations.
In this task you will identify and measure the duration of Real-Time Blackholing (RTBH) events.
You will need to become familiar with Blackholing events. Good resources for this includeRFC 7999, Section 2,BGP communities: A weapon for the Internet (Part 2), and the videoNokia - SROS: RTBH - Blackhole Community.
This task will use cache files from the update_files_blackholing subdirectories. These are update files, so you will pass “upd-file" in your call to set_data_interface_option().
Using the data from the cache files, we will identify events where prefixes are tagged with a
Remote Triggered Blackholing (RTBH) community and measure the time duration of the RTBH events by completing the function rtbh_event_durations(). Make sure that your function returns the data structure exactly as specified in bgpm.py.
The duration of an RTBH event for a given peerIP/prefix pair is the time elapsed between the last (A)nnouncement of the peerIP/prefix that is tagged with an RTBH community value and the first (W)ithdrawal of the peerIP/prefix. In other words, we are looking at the stream of Announcements and Withdrawals for a given peerIP/prefix and identifying only explicit withdrawals for an RTBH tagged peerIP/prefix.
To identify and compute the duration of an RTBH event for a given peerIP/prefix, you will need to monitor the stream of (A)nnouncements and (W)ithdrawals separately per peerIP/prefix pair.
- Example: Given the stream: A1 A2 A3(RTBH) A4(RTBH) W1 W2 W3 W4 for a specific peerIP/prefix pair, A4(RTBH)-W1 denotes an RTBH event and the duration is calculated by taking the time difference between A4(RTBH) and W1.
- Note: There can be more than one RTBH event in a given stream. For example, in the stream A1 A2 A3(RTBH) A4(RTBH) W1 W2 W3 W4 A5(RTBH) W5, there are two RTBH events: A4(RTBH)-W1 and A5(RTBH)-W5.
- Example: Given the stream A1 A2 A3(RTBH) A4 A5 W1 W2 for a specific peerIP/prefix pair, the announcement A3(RTBH) followed by A4 is an implicit withdrawal. There is no explicit withdrawal and, thus, no RTBH event.
- In case of duplicate announcements, use the latest.
- Consider only non-zero duration events.
Submit bgpm.py to Gradescope.
|
Points |
Task to be completed |
|
10 |
Task 1A |
|
10 |
Task 1B |
|
10 |
Task 1C |
|
|
|
|
30 |
Task 2 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
Task 3 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
Task 4 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
Total Points |
Honor Code / Academic Integrity / Plagiarism
Please refer to the Georgia Tech Honor Code located here:
https://policylibrary.gatech.edu/student-affairs/academic-honor-code
We strictly enforce Section 3. Student Responsibilities including these prohibited actions:
- Unauthorized Access: Possessing, using, or exchanging improperly acquired written or verbal information in the preparation of a problem set, laboratory report, essay, examination, or other academic assignment.
- Unauthorized Collaboration: Unauthorized interaction with another Student or Students in the fulfillment of academic requirements.
- Plagiarism: Submission of material that is wholly or substantially identical to that created or published by another person or persons, without adequate credit notations indicating the authorship.
- False Claims of Performance: False claims for work that has been submitted by a Student.